Jones v. Neven et al
Filing
195
ORDER Denying 186 Motion for Order Requiring the Clerk to Cease Artificially Inflating Response Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 7/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:07-cv-01088-JCM-GWF
ORDER
12
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Order (#186), filed
13
July 13, 2011.
14
Plaintiff argues that the Clerk of Court is “artificially inflating” response times to his
15
various motions by adding three (3) days for service. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
16
Procedure 5(a), unless otherwise provided within the rules, written motions, except those that can
17
be heard ex parte, must be served on every party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(D). Rule 5(b) identifies
18
several ways in which service under Rule 5(a) may be had, including, among others, mailing it
19
to the last known address or by filing it electronically. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2). Rule 6(d)
20
provides that “[w]hen a party may or must act within a specified time after service and service is
21
made under Rule 5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F), 3 days are added after the period would otherwise
22
expire under Rule 6(a).” The Clerk of Court’s ministerial actions in this case are consistent with
23
the aforementioned rules. Accordingly,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Order (#186) is
25
denied.
26
DATED this 18th day of July, 2011.
27
28
_________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?