Jones v. Neven et al

Filing 215

ORDER Denying as Moot 210 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, Denying as Moot 211 Motion for Orders, and Denying 212 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/2/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11
12

CHRISTOPHER A. JONES,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:07-cv-01088-JCM-GWF
ORDER
Motion to File a Late Reply and
Motion for Order (#210)
Motion to Strike (#212)

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Exceed Page Limit and Motion for

15

Order (#210), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (#212), filed on August 30, 2011. Plaintiff requests the

16

Court grant him leave to exceed the page limit in his reply brief in support of his Motion for Sanctions

17

(#189) and Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of the Answers (#188). Plaintiff further requests the

18

Court order Deputy Attorney General Palmer to appear in court and testify in connection with his

19

Motion for Sanctions (#188). On August 30, 2011, the Court entered an Order (#209) denying

20

Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (#188) and granting in part, denying in part Plaintiff’s Motion to

21

Determine the Sufficiency of the Answers (#189). The Plaintiff’s requests are therefore moot as the

22

Court has already disposed of motions at issue.

23

Plaintiff further requests the Court strike Exhibit B attached to Defendant’s Response to Motion

24

for Sanctions (#202). Plaintiff claims this document was untimely filed in response to the Court’s

25

Order (#147) and therefore should be stricken. On April 20, 2011, the Court ordered Defendant Neven

26

to respond to Plaintiff’s request for production (#147). This order did not require Defendant Neven to

27

file his response with the Court, but rather ordered Defendant Neven to provide the requested

28

information to Plaintiff. Despite Plaintiff’s contentions, Exhibit B was not filed in response to the

1

Court’s Order (#147). Rather, it was attached as an exhibit in support of the Defendants’ Response to

2

Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions. Therefore, the document is not untimely, and the Court will not strike

3

it from the record.

4
5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Exceed Page Limit and Motion for
Order (#210) is denied as moot.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (#212) is denied.

7

DATED this 2nd day of September 2011.

8
9
10
11

GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2