Jones v. Neven et al
Filing
265
ORDER Granting 251 Motion for Order. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall detach the exhibit from 251 Motion and enter it separately as exhibit 29 to 244 Motion for Summary Judgment which was filed on 12/16/11. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES,
2:07-CV-1088 JCM (GWF)
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
N/A
N/A
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
14
Date:
Time:
Defendant.
15
16
ORDER
17
Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Christopher A. Jones’ motion for order. (Doc.
18
#251). Defendants James Cox, et. al. filed a non-opposition. (Doc. #253). Plaintiff did not file a
19
reply.
20
Plaintiff’s motion seeks an order from the court directing the clerk to include an exhibit,
21
attached to the motion, as exhibit 29 in his motion for summary judgment. (Doc. #251). Plaintiff
22
asserts that he inadvertently omitted this exhibit.
23
24
In their non-opposition, defendants assert that they “consider this motion an errata and have
no objection to the proposed correction to [p]laintiff’s motion.” (Doc. #253).
25
Good cause appearing, and there being no opposition,
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pro se plaintiff Christopher
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
A. Jones’ motion for order (doc. #251) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall detach the exhibit from plaintiff’s motion
2
(doc. #251) and enter it separately as exhibit 29 to the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,
3
which was filed on December 16, 2011. (Doc. #244).
4
DATED February 24, 2012.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?