USA v. Estate of E. Wayne Hage et al
Filing
272
ORDER Granting 271 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 267 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Responses due by 11/21/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/4/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Mark L. Pollot, Esq.
California Bar No. 136161
1020 Strawberry Lane
Boise, ID 83712
Phone:
(208) 867-8389
E-mail:
mpollot1@clear.net
John W. Hoffman
Nevada State Bar No. 857
Hoffman, Test, Guinan & Collier
429 West Plumb Lane
P. O. Box 187
Reno, NV 89504
Phone: (775) 322-4081
Facsimile: (775) 322-3841
Email: office@htag.reno.nv.us
Attorneys for the Estate of E. Wayne Hage
Wayne N. Hage, Pro Se
P.O. Box 513
Tonopah, NV 89049
775-482-4187
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff ,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
)
THE ESTATE OF E. WAYNE HAGE,
)
et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants
)
___________________________________ /
2:07-cv-01154-RCJ-VCF
DEFENDANTS ESTATE OF E. WAYNE
HAGE AND WAYNE N. HAGE’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT
COMPLAINT
MOTION
COME NOW DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT ESTATE OF E. WAYNE HAGE
AND DEFENDANT WAYNE N. HAGE and move this Court for an order extending time to file
its response to plaintiff United States’s Motion to amend/correct complaint in the above
captioned matter. Plaintiff’s Motion was filed on October 20, 2001 and the date for response is
calendared for November 6, 2011. However, since that date falls on a Sunday, the actual date for
filing defendants’ responses is November 7, 2011. Defendants are seeking an extension of time
to file of two weeks and therefore move this court for an order extending the time for filing their
responses to November 21, 2011. Counsel for plaintiff United States has indicated that it does
not oppose this motion and has authorized defendants to so represent. The reasons for this
motion are, as described further below, counsel for the Estate’s travel and work schedules, the
medical needs of Counsel’s family, the discovery schedule in this case, and defendant Wayne N.
Hage’s schedule.
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
Plaintiff and defendants herein have been working together on establishing a stipulated
discovery schedule. Some issues regarding the scope of discovery and similar matters required
some time to work out among the parties. That stipulation has now been filed. At the same time,
other matters in this case and family matters have occurred that affect the ability of both
defendants to file responses within the normal time established by the rules. Counsel for the
Estate of E. Wayne Hage is a sole practitioner having the primary responsibility for responding to
plaintiff’s motion, conducting discovery, coordinating with plaintiff on matters such as
discovery, and coordinating with defendant Wayne N. Hage who is not only a defendant in his
own right who is representing himself pro se, but is also executor for defendant Estate of E.
Wayne Hage with whom counsel for the Estate must coordinate. Mr. Hage has recently had a
new baby and is operating and maintaining the Pine Creek Ranch, which is property of the Estate
of E. Wayne Hage. This time of year is a particularly busy one for Mr. Hage as he must prepare
the Pine Creek Ranch for winter including, but limited to, moving of livestock. In addition, he
must work on the issues of and matters in this case, including participating in discovery, and
preparing and responding to briefs and motions, inter alia, on his own behalf, among other
things. He was also a full participant in negotiating the discover stipulation described herein
above.
As part of their activities in this matter, the parties hereto scheduled depositions for
Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, November 2-4, 2011, the and have prepared for and traveled
to Ely, Nevada, the site of the scheduled depositions by car on November 1, and will be traveling
from Ely to their respective homes on November 4-5, after the depositions conclude. Both Mr.
Hage and counsel for the Estate have also required time to prepare for these depositions. In
addition, counsel for the Estate has required time during the period following the filing of
plaintiff’s motion, and will require additional time following the depositions, to prepare his son,
age 10, for surgery on December 1, 2011. Likewise, all parties will be engaged in preparing a
joint status report in this matter which is due to be filed in approximately one-and-one-half
weeks from the date of this motion and will be conferring on other discovery and trial related
matters in this matter in the same period. These preparations, litigation activities in this case, a
brief respiratory illness of the Estate’s counsel in the past two weeks, other previously scheduled
matters of the Estate’s counsel in other matters, travel on these other matters, and the abovedescribed matters affecting Mr. Hage as well as occasional difficulties establishing telephonic
Motion for Extension of Time: Page 2 of 3
communication with Mr. Hage at times because of the remote location of the Pine Creek Ranch,
have combined to interfere with defendants’ abilities to complete their responses to plaintiff’s
motion in the time allotted.
Defendants have conferred with counsel for plaintiff on these matters who has indicated
that plaintiff does not oppose this motion and has authorized defendants to so represent to this
court.
NOW THEREFORE, defendants herein respectfully requests that an order be issued
granting the Estate’s Motion extending the time for it to file their responses to plaintiff’s Motion
to file an amended/corrected complaint to and including November 21, 2011.
Respectfully submitted this 4th Day of November, 2011,
Wayne N. Hage, pro se,
Mark L. Pollot, Esq.
Estate of E. Wayne Hage
By /s/ Mark L. Pollot
Mark L. Pollot, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant/CounterClaimant, Estate of E. Wayne Hage
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: This 4th day of November, 2011.
_______________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
Motion for Extension of Time: Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?