Menalco, FZE et al v. Buchan et al

Filing 372

ORDER Granting 370 Stipulation of Dismissal. Phoenix Technology Holdings Inc., Schimatic Cash Transactions Network.Com, and Robert Gordon Buchan terminated. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/1/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 onald J. Campbell (No. 1216) J. Colby Williams (No. 5549) Wade W. Rabenhorst (No. 9655) CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS 700 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel: (702) 382-5222 Fax: (702) 382-0540 Mark J. MacDougall (Admitted pro hac vice) Anthony T. Pierce (Admitted pro hac vice) Colleen M. Coyle (Admitted pro hac vice) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202) 887-4000 Fax: (202) 887-4288 Attorneys for The International Investor, K.S.C.C. and Menalco, FZE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA MENALCO, FZE, et al., Case No. 2:07 Civ. 1178-PMP-PAL Plaintiffs, DRAFT 10-04-10 v. ROBERT GORDON BUCHAN, et al., Defendants. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs The International Investor, K.S.C.C., Menalco FZE, and Defendants, Phoenix Holding Co., Ltd., Schimatic Cash Transaction Network.com, and Robert G. Buchan stipulate as follows: 1. The parties to the lawsuit have reached a mutually agreeable settlement of the claims in the complaint, counterclaim and cross claim and desire to end the litigation between them. D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 . A copy of the settlement agreement is attached as Ex. A. 3. The parties stipulate that the Court should dismiss the complaint, counterclaims, and cross claim with prejudice against the parties to this stipulation, with each party to bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees. October 29, 2010 Respectfully submitted, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP /s/ Mark J. MacDougall (Admitted pro hac vice) Anthony T. Pierce (Admitted pro hac vice) Colleen M. Coyle (Admitted pro hac vice) 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202) 887-4000 Fax: (202) 887-4288 CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS J. Colby Williams (No. 5549) Wade W. Rabenhorst (No. 9655) 700 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel: (702) 382-5222 Fax: (702) 382-0540 Attorneys for TII and Menalco /s/ David J. Merrill, P.C. 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 david@djmerrillpc.com 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ttorney for Defendants Phoenix Technology Holdings, Inc. and Schimatic Cash Transactions Network.com, Inc. /s/ Hector J. Carbajal II Carbajal & McNutt, LLP 625 South Eighth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 hjc@cmlawnv.com Kenneth A. Shapiro William R. Joiner Mitchell & Shapiro LLP 3490 Piedmont Road, Suite 650 Atlanta, Georgia 30305 ken@mitchellshapiro.com Attorneys for Defendant Robert Gordon Buchan 1st SO ORDERED on this ____ day of November, 2010 ____________________________________________ United States District Court Judge 3 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b), I hereby certify that on the __ day of October, 2010, service of a Stipulation of Dismissal was made electronically and by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on the following: David J. Merrill, P.C. 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 david@djmerrillpc.com Attorney for Defendants Phoenix Technology Holdings, Inc. and Schimatic Cash Transactions Network.com, Inc. Hector J. Carbajal II Carbajal & McNutt, LLP 625 South Eighth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 hjc@cmlawnv.com Attorney for Defendant Robert Gordon Buchan Kenneth A. Shapiro Mitchell & Shapiro LLP 3490 Piedmont Road, Suite 650 Atlanta, Georgia 30305 ken@mitchellshapiro.com Attorney for Defendant Robert Gordon Buchan Mark Vernon George Bone-Knell V52 Deema 1 Emirates Lakes PO 92777 Dubai, United Arab Emirates markboneknell@googlemail.com Defendant By: /s/ Adria Hicks 4 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?