Rosenthal v. Poster

Filing 60

ORDER Denying without prejudice 59 Ex Parte Motion for Order Allowing Examination of Judgment Debtor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/2/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 DANIEL ROSENTHAL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MARCIA HARTMAN, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:07-cv-01204-KJD-PAL ORDER (Mot/Exam Judgment Debtor - Dkt #59) 12 13 Before the court is an Ex Parte Motion for Order Allowing Examination of Judgment Debtor 14 (Dkt. #59). The application seeks an order requiring the Defendant, Marsha Hartman, to appear for a 15 judgment debtor examination. The application is based on the provisions of N.R.S. 21.270 and Fed. R. 16 Civ. P. 69(a)(2). 17 The district judge entered a default judgment against the Defendant on April 29, 2009 in the 18 amount of $210, 350. See Dkt. #58. Plaintiff seeks to examine Defendant Hartman under oath to 19 determine whether she has any assets available to satisfy the judgment. Plaintiff also seeks an order 20 requiring her to bring documents identified in the application to the examination. N.R.S. 21.270 and 21 Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(2) authorize a judgment debtor examination. However, N.R.S. 21.270(1)(b) 22 provides that no judgment debtor may be required to appear outside the county in which he or she 23 resides. The application does not address the county in which the judgment debtor resides. 24 Accordingly, 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Order Allowing Examination of Judgment 2 Debtor (Dkt. #59) is DENIED without prejudice. If the Defendant/Judgment Debtor is a resident of 3 Clark County, Nevada, Plaintiff may re-file the motion. The motion shall attach a proposed order. 4 Dated this 2nd day of August, 2011. 5 6 7 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?