Hartwell v. Neven et al

Filing 36

ORDER Denying 33 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order and 34 Motion to Alter or Amend Amended Order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/2/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Hartwell v. Neven et al

Doc. 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ KENT J. DAWSON United States District Judge Before the court are petitioner's motion for reconsideration (#33) and motion to alter or amend amended order (#34). Respondents have filed an opposition (#35). Petitioner expresses dissatisfaction with the court's denial of his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (#18). His contentions are more appropriate for appellate review than a motion for reconsideration. See McCarthy v. Mayo, 827 F.2d 1310, 1318 (9th Cir. 1987). See also Plotkin v. Pacific Tel. and Tel. Co., 688 F.2d 1291, 1293 (9th Cir. 1982). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for reconsideration (#33) and motion to alter or amend amended order (#34) are DENIED. DATED: October 2, 2010 vs. D. W. NEVEN, et al., Respondents. WILLIE LAMAR HARTWELL, Petitioner, Case No. 2:07-CV-01371-KJD-(LRL) ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Dockets.Justia.com