Gray v. Skolnik et al

Filing 56

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/16/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6

***
7

MALCOLM L. GRAY,
8

Plaintiff,

9
10

vs.

11

HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al.,

12

Defendants.
13
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:07-CV-01379-PMP-VCF

ORDER

Having read and considered Plaintiff Gray’s Motion to Show Cause Why

15

Plaintiff’s Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed (Doc. #53), and Defendants’

16

Response thereto (Doc. #55) and finding that Plaintiff has failed to serve the

17

remaining undismissed Defendants in this action notwithstanding two extensions of

18

time within which to do so, and finding further that Plaintiff has not met his burden

19

of showing that good cause exists for his failure to timely serve the remaining

20

named Defendants in this action, and good cause appearing,

21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED

22

with prejudice.

23

DATED: February 16, 2012.

24
25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge