Conrad et al v. Sinclair Leasing Co., Inc. et al
Filing
48
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Claims against defendants Sinclair Leasing Co., Inc and David S. Chiles, Jr. are Dismissed. Clerk to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Brian E. Sandoval. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AXM)
Ft ( .. ) p
( r 7 : Ei1 C()C,1kE!71R 'it.(;:'f(E(f)N) l h8) J 2 g.'9L2)t) 1 E( E :t :)2 7 , Lr '
,
a
3
4
1
j
!
L q) ; vj
.
-' ' q
1 !
l L . L
.. .
. --' .,:q. v .,T 7: r . .,
.
)
. .
t. tv( .'..? ?! . , ' i r. h k t
. ..
C Z1' '5 ' L. .'. -- 2-. '=- -
5
6
7
U N I E D STA T E S D I T R I T C O U R T T S C
D I T R I T O F NEVA DA S C
W ER DC O BC,I C . a Nevada cor or ton, N, p al
Pl it@, ani
8
BRANDO N LEE CONIAD,an idiiual R q vd ; 9 W ERDNA SUCONRADJ'n idilualaqd n vd ' ,
10
Case No. 2: 7- W 1 24- ES- R L :0C 4 B L ORDER
11
VS .
1 2
S I C LAI LEA S l G C 0. I C . a Texas N R N N,
1 cor oq ton,DAVI S.CHI ES,JR. 3 q ai ' D L ,
an l dl i ual efal, n vd ,
14
D ef ndant . e s
15
1 6
Pr sen l be or t e c ur i a Not e t Coun el s a tt Lo a Rue 41 1( 5 e t f e h o ts y io c s Pur u n o c l l - M )
1 subm it d by t e Cour Cl r ' ofie seeki g di m isaloft i m aterf rwantofpr secuton 7 te h t e k s fc n ss hs to o i
1 as t def ndant Si cl i Leasi g Co. I c.and Davi S. l s,Jr The Notce w as ent r d 8 oe s n ar n ,n d Chi e . i ee 1 on Januar 29,2009 and advied Pl i tfs ofa dim isaldeadl e of Febr ar 28,2009. 9 y s a n if ss i n uy
20 Pl i tfs have notfl d a r sponse. a n if i e e 21 BACKG RO UN D
2 2
Thi mater sor i al r mov d t t i c u tonOcober 200 .( 1 .Laer o s t wa i n l e e o h s o r gy t 25, 7 # ) t , n
2 Dec m b r31, 7, ef n an Cen r l asFr m e &Al n en ,nc,' en r l as'fed 3 ee 200 d e d t ta Tex a i m t I (c ta Tex ' i g d )l
24 a Moton t Di m is f rLack ofJursdi ton. O n J nuar 2,2008, hi c ur isued a m i ut iosso i ci a y t s o ts ne
2 or er( 8)t c m pl wi t e r qur mens ofKl nel v.Eienberv, 49 F.d 409 ( t Ci. 5 d # o o y t h e ie t h ie n k r8 2 9h r
2 1 88) d Ran v. wlnd,1 4 F. d 9 2 ( tCi 1 9 ) The miu eor er t id Plit f 6 9 an d Ro a 5 3 5 9b r 9 8 . . n t d no ie a n is f f 27 t att ei opposiin mustbe fld wihi ffeen ( 5)days. Pl itfsdi notr spond t t e h hr to i e t n it 1 an if d e oh
2 mo in and t i c ud gr ned i on Mar h6, 08.( 29) On F b uaw 1 , 08 De en an 8 t o hs o at t c 20 # . er 3 20 fd t
l Unin Bank& Tr s Comp n Cunin Bank ) i d a Mo i nt Dim isf rLa ko J r dit n o ut ay o ' fe l to o s s o c f u i c i so
2 an Al r at e Mo i n t Dim is f rl pr perVenu .( 22) Agai ,t i c u tis ed a d tn i ev t o ss om o o e# . n hs o r s u 3 mi u e or er( 23 t c mpl wi t e r qui m en so Kl qee v Eien erv, F. d 409 n t d # )o o y t h e r h e t f i l . k b r 849 2 n 4 ( tCi.1 88 a d Ran v. w lnd,1 4 F. d 95 ( tCi,1 9 ) Plit f di n tr s on 9h r 9 ) n d Ro a 5 3 2 9h r 9 8 . an is d o e p d f 5 t t e mot n an onApr 1 , 08 t e c ur gr n ed t i mot n a wel( 37 . Iapp ar oh i od i 6 20 h o t a t hs i s l# ) t e s l o
6 t atPl itfs'astactviyi t i casewast eipadi i aton i a Joi tSt t m entRe:Rem oval h a n if I i t n hs hr cp i n n ae
7 ( 7)on Nov m b r28,200 . ldeed,as n t d earir Pl it f di no ev n r s on t # ee 7n oe l , a n is d t e e p d o e f
8 CentalTexas orUni n Bank' m otons t di m is. r o s i oss
9
11 1 2 1 3
f ac or an e wi Fe . Ci. 41 b)an LR 41 1 an h vn c n ier d t e t e n c d c t d R. v P, ( d h - , d a ig o sd e h h
DI C USS I N S O A. Feder lRul ofCi i Pr cedur 41 and LocalRul 41a e vl o e e1
1 post r oft i case,t e coud fnds t atdi m isali appr prat . 0 ue hs h i h ss s o ie
Feder lRul ofCi i Pr cedur 41 gover s t e i vol nt r dim i salofa pl itf' a e vl o e n h n u ay s s a n if s
1 cl i f rf iur t pr secut .l pr vi es t atit e pl i tf f i t pr secut ort com pl w i 4 am o a l e o o e t o d h f h a n if a l o o s eo yt h
1 t ese r l s ora cour or er a def ndantmay m ove t di m is t e acton orany cl i agai st 5h ue td, e ossh i am n 1 i. I vol nt r di m isali wihi t e dicr ton oft e coud. Bi hon v.Lew i ,155 F. d 1094, 6 t n u a y s s s t n h s ei h s s 3
1 1 96 ( tCi.1 98) Ii s le ien t atPlit f ha ef i d t pr s c t t i aci ni an 7 0 9b r 9 . t s e f vd t h a n is v a l o o e u e hs to n y f e
18 m eani gf l n u way.They even f i d t oppose m otonst dim i s.LR 41- pr vi est ataIcii al o e i oss 1 o d h I vl
1 ac ins t a ha e b en pen ig i t i c ud f rmor t an nie ( )mon h wi ou an 9t o ht v e d n n hs o o eh n9 ts t t y h
20 pr ceedi g of r cor havi g been t k n, m ay, afer notc , be di m ised f r want of o n ed n ae t ie ss o 21 pr secuton on m oton ofcounselorby t e cour, Her ,despi notce ot er ie,Pl itfs o i i h t e t ei h ws a n if
22 have notpadii at d i any pr ceedi g ofr cor i al ostsevent en m ont s. Undert ese cp e n o n e dn m e h h
2 cr u san es, s is l t i c s pu s an t Fe .R. v. 41 b)i app opr t . 3 i m t c dim s a of hs a e r u t o d Ci P. ( s r i e c a
24 M or over t e publ ' i t r s i t e expedii us r sol ton oft i case,t e coud' e ,h i s ne e t n h c to e u i hs h s
2 n edt mana e i doc e and prj diet de en an sSicai L asn Co. I c and Davd 5eo gt s kt e u c o f d t n l r e ig , n . i
26 S.Chi s,Jr r quie dim isal l e .e r s s .
27 // /
28 // /
2
CO NC LUSI N O I I ht of t e f r goi g, I I HEREBY O RD ER ED t at Pl i t#s'cl i s ni g h oe n T S h an i am def ndant Si cl i Leasi g Co. I c, and Davi S. Chi s, Jr ar DI M I SED e s n ar n ,n d l e .e SS
prj die. Th cer o t e cou ts alener u gm en ac or igl. eu c e l k fh r h l t jd t c dn y
I I SO ORDERED. TS
D T D T i1-Lyo Api 0 9 A E : hs 2 f r2 0 . l
U nied St t s DititJudge t a e s rc
17
18 19
20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?