Pauluk et al v. Clark County Health District

Filing 101

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, on 7/27/2012, by Deputy Clerk: Ari Caytuero, Denying 71 Motion to Compel without prejudice and Denying 89 Motion to Extend Time Regarding Dispositive Matter as moot. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
***
WENDY J. PAULUK, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CLARK COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.

PRESENT:

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) Dated:

2:07-cv-01681-PMP -VCF
MINUTE ORDER

July 27, 2012

THE HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH, United States Magistrate Judge

JUDICIAL ASSISTANT:

Mai Tieu

RECORDER:

None

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S):

None Appearing

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S):

None Appearing

Before the court are plaintiff Wendy J. Pauluk’s Motion to Compel (#71) and Motion to Extend Time
Regarding Dispositive Matter (#89).
Plaintiff filed her motion to compel production of decedent’s tissues on March 16, 2011. (#71). On April
7, 2011, the court stayed the action pending further order from the court. (#74). Defendants filed an opposition
to the motion to compel on April 12, 2011. (#75). In light of the stay, no reply was filed. On February 2, 2012,
the court ordered that, by April 2, 2012, plaintiff must retain counsel to represent defendant the Estate of Daniel
Pauluk. (#88). On March 16, 2012, plaintiff filed the instant motion to extend time to retain counsel. (#89).
Defendants filed an opposition on March 23, 2012. (#90).
On April 20, 2012, the court held a status conference, and permitted plaintiff’s counsel to confirm
representation by June 8, 2012. (#96). On June 8, 2012, the court held a status conference. (#98). Counsel was
not confirmed during the status conference. Id. On June 11, 2012, the court entered an order to show cause why
the complaint should not be dismissed. (#99). On July 25, 2012, counsel for plaintiffs filed a response to the
order to show cause. (#100).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Wendy J. Pauluk’s Motion to Compel (#71) is DENIED without prejudice.
Plaintiff may renew the motion, dependent upon the status of the case, after the court issues a ruling on the Order
to Show Cause (#99).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time Regarding Dispositive Matter (#89)
ntiff s
is DENIED as moot.
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE