Kelly et al v. CSE Safeguard Insurance Company et al

Filing 183

ORDER that 179 Motion for Attorney Fees is DENIED without prejudice subject to renewal upon resolution of the pending appeal. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JAMES KELLY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 Case No. 2:08-CV-88-KJD-RJJ CSE SAFEGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER 14 Defendant. 15 16 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (#179). On September 17 27, 2011 the Court granted (#168) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Judgment (#169) 18 was entered for Defendant on September 28, 2011. Plaintiff filed his Notice of Appeal (#172) on 19 October 13, 2011. Defendant filed the present motion on October 19, 2011. 20 Plaintiff’s appeal in this action is still pending. Though the Court is not divested of 21 jurisdiction to decide the issue of attorney’s fees during the pendency of the appeal, the Court finds 22 that judicial economy would be best served by denying the motion without prejudice. The outcome 23 on appeal would certainly influence the outcome of the motion. Furthermore, given that Defendant 24 seeks $182,000.00 in attorney’s fees, Plaintiff should be a given a chance to respond to the motion. 25 It appears that Plaintiff believes the motion to be untimely or briefing to be stayed pending the 26 1 appeal. However, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2)(E) exempts motions made under 28 2 U.S.C. § 1927 from Rule 54's timing requirements. 3 4 5 Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (#179) is DENIED without prejudice subject to renewal upon resolution of the pending appeal. DATED this 15th day of August 2012. 6 7 8 9 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?