Kelly et al v. CSE Safeguard Insurance Company et al
Filing
183
ORDER that 179 Motion for Attorney Fees is DENIED without prejudice subject to renewal upon resolution of the pending appeal. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
JAMES KELLY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
Case No. 2:08-CV-88-KJD-RJJ
CSE SAFEGUARD INSURANCE
COMPANY,
ORDER
14
Defendant.
15
16
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (#179). On September
17
27, 2011 the Court granted (#168) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Judgment (#169)
18
was entered for Defendant on September 28, 2011. Plaintiff filed his Notice of Appeal (#172) on
19
October 13, 2011. Defendant filed the present motion on October 19, 2011.
20
Plaintiff’s appeal in this action is still pending. Though the Court is not divested of
21
jurisdiction to decide the issue of attorney’s fees during the pendency of the appeal, the Court finds
22
that judicial economy would be best served by denying the motion without prejudice. The outcome
23
on appeal would certainly influence the outcome of the motion. Furthermore, given that Defendant
24
seeks $182,000.00 in attorney’s fees, Plaintiff should be a given a chance to respond to the motion.
25
It appears that Plaintiff believes the motion to be untimely or briefing to be stayed pending the
26
1
appeal. However, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2)(E) exempts motions made under 28
2
U.S.C. § 1927 from Rule 54's timing requirements.
3
4
5
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (#179) is DENIED without prejudice
subject to renewal upon resolution of the pending appeal.
DATED this 15th day of August 2012.
6
7
8
9
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?