Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 89

ORDER Denying 68 Motion For Order in Limine, consistent with the Courts Order 87 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to impose monetary sanctions related to these motions. Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 9/24/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 14 15 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion 16 For Order in Limine (#68). 17 The Court having reviewed the Motion (#68) and the Opposition (#75) and good cause 18 appearing therefore, 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion 20 For Order in Limine (#68) is DENIED consistent with the Court's Order (#87). 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to impose monetary sanctions 22 related to these motions. Each party shall bear their own costs. 23 DATED this 24th 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT J. JOHNSTON United States Magistrate Judge day of September, 2010. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. DAYTON VALLEY INVESTORS, LLC, d/b/a/ LAKEMONT HOMES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** 2:08-cv-00127-ECR-RJJ ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?