Harmon v. Clark County

Filing 31

ORDER re no proposed Joint Pretrial Order having been filed pursuant to 30 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment and allowing the parties an additional 14 days from entry of this order to file a proposed Joint Pretrial Order or risk suffering sanctions. ( Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/22/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/8/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 12, 2009, Judge Larry R. Hicks granted in part and denied in part Defendant's Motion for Summary (#30) and further ordered that "the parties shall lodge their proposed joint pretrial order within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order." No proposed joint pretrial order having been filed with the Court, the parties are in violation of this court's order. The court will allow the parties an additional fourteen (14) day period from the date that this Order is entered and served to file a Joint Pretrial Order or risk suffering sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of January, 2010. vs. CLARK COUNTY, Defendant. CHARLES HARMON, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:08-cv-00151-LRH-LRL ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?