TRP Entertainment, LLC v. BC Entertainment, Inc. et al
Filing
85
ORDER Granting 82 Motion to Vacate and Reset Settlement Conference. Settlement Conference set for 5/8/2013 09:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
TRP ENTERTAINMENT, LLC,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
BC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al.,
12
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:08-cv-00579-LDG-CWH
ORDER
13
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s, TRP Entertainment, LLC, Motion to Vacate
14
and Reset Settlement Conference (#82), filed on March 11, 2013. The Court also considered the
15
Declaration of Nancy R. Lindsley (#83), filed on March 11, 2013.
16
Plaintiff seeks to reschedule the settlement conference currently set for April 30, 2013 due to
17
a conflict that precludes its participation. Plaintiff’s Counsel attests that she contacted Defendant
18
Barrie Cunningham to agree on a new date, but he indicated that he would be unavailable until
19
November 2013. See Declaration #83, 2.
20
Defendant Barrie Cunningham failed to submit a response to Plaintiff’s motion. Local Rule
21
7-2(d) states, “The failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any
22
motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion.” Therefore, the Court finds that
23
Defendant Barrie Cunningham has consented to the rescheduling of the settlement conference.
24
Accordingly, the settlement conference is hereby rescheduled to commence at 9:00 AM on
25
Wednesday, May 8, 2013 in the chambers of the undersigned Magistrate Judge, Room 3014, Lloyd
26
D. George United States Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada.
27
Unless ordered otherwise, the following individual(s) are required to be present in person
28
for the duration of the settlement conference:
1
1.
All counsel of record who will be participating in the trial and who have full authority
to settle this case;
2.
All parties appearing pro se;
3.
All individual parties;
4.
In the case of non-individual parties, an officer or representative with binding
authority to settle this matter up to the full amount of the claim or last demand made;
and
5.
If any party is subject to coverage by an insurance carrier, then a representative of the
insurance carrier with authority to settle this matter up to the full amount of the claim
or last demand.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A request for an exception to the above personal attendance requirements must be filed and
9
served on all parties at least fourteen (14) days prior to the settlement conference.
10
PREPARATION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
11
In preparation for the settlement conference, each party shall submit a confidential settlement
12
conference statement for in camera review. The statement shall contain the following:
13
1.
A brief statement of the nature of the action.
2.
A concise summary of the evidence that supports your theory of the case, including
14
15
the names of individuals disclosed pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(i), the Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii)
16
computation of damages, and the Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iv) insurance information. You must provide all
17
information which documents or supports your damages claims. Copies of medical records or
18
treatment records need not be submitted but, rather, shall be provided in a table or summary format.
19
3.
Attach to your statement any documents or exhibits which are relevant to key factual
20
or legal issues, including selected pages from deposition transcripts or responses to other discovery
21
requests.
22
4.
An analysis of the key issues involved in the litigation. The analysis must include a
23
discussion of the strongest points in your case, both legal and factual, and a frank discussion of the
24
weakest points as well. The Court expects you to present a thorough analysis of the key issues and
25
candid evaluation of the merits of your case.
26
5.
Identify and explain any obstacles to settlement, e.g. medical liens, statutory caps, or
27
motions pending before the Court.
28
2
1
6.
The history of settlement discussions, if any, which have occurred in this case.
2
Provide any demands, offers, or offers of judgment that have been made and, if applicable, the
3
reasons they have been rejected. Attach a copy of all settlement correspondence, including all
4
written demands or offers and responses thereto.
5
7.
Provide the initial settlement proposal that will be presented at the settlement
6
conference with a justification for any monetary amount. The proposal must include any non-
7
monetary settlement terms that will be presented.
8
9
10
11
The settlement conference statements shall be received in my chambers - Room 3014 - no
later than Wednesday, May 1, 2013. DO NOT SERVE A COPY ON OPPOSING COUNSEL.
DO NOT DELIVER OR MAIL COPIES TO THE CLERK’S OFFICE.
The purpose of the statement is to assist the undersigned Magistrate Judge in preparing for
12
and conducting the settlement conference. In order to facilitate a meaningful conference, your
13
utmost candor in responding to all of the above-listed questions is required. The settlement
14
conference statement will remain confidential. If this case does not settle, the settlement
15
conference statement will not be disclosed to the judge who ultimately presides over the trial. Each
16
statement will be securely maintained in my chambers, and will be destroyed following the
17
conference.
18
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THIS
19
ORDER WILL SUBJECT THE NON-COMPLIANT PARTY TO SANCTIONS UNDER
20
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 16(f).
21
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s, TRP Entertainment, LLC, Motion to Vacate
23
24
and Reset Settlement Conference (#82) is granted.
DATED this 27th day of March, 2013.
25
26
27
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?