Federal Trade Commission v. Publishers Business Services, Inc. et al

Filing 254

ORDER Denying 249 Motion for Costs Pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2:08-CV-00620-PMP-PAL ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) PUBLISHERS BUSINESS SERVICES, ) INC., a corporation; ED DANTUMA ) ENTERPRISES, INC., a corporation, ) ) also dba PUBLISHERS DIRECT ) SERVICES and PUBLISHERS ) BUSINESS SERVICES; PERSIS DANTUMA; EDWARD DANTUMA; ) ) BRENDA DANTUMA CHANG; ) DRIES DANTUMA; DIRK ) DANTUMA; and JEFFREY ) DANTUMA, individually and as ) officers or managers of publishers Business Services, Inc., or Ed Dantuma ) ) Enterprises, Inc., ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ORDER The Court having read and considered Defendants’ Motion for Costs 20 21 Pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. #249), Plaintiff’s 22 Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. #250), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. #251), 23 and finding that Defendants are not entitled as “prevailing parties,” and are not 24 entitled to recover costs under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and good cause 25 appearing, 26 /// 1 1 2 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Costs Pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. #249) is DENIED. 3 4 DATED: September 7, 2011. 5 6 7 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?