Federal Trade Commission v. Publishers Business Services, Inc. et al
Filing
288
ORDER Granting 287 Stipulation to Modify Case Schedule and Extend Certain Deadlines. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/12/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:08-cv-00620-APG-GWF Document 287-1 Filed 10/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Peter W. Homer (admitted pro hac vice)
Homer Bonner, P.A.
1441 Brickell Avenue; 1200 Four Seasons Tower
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 350-5100; Facsimile: (305) 982-0066
Email:phomer@homerbonner.com
Attorneys for Brenda Schang, Dirk Dantuma
Jeff Dantuma, and Dries Dantuma
Jeffrey Willis, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 4797)
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200; Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Email: jwillis@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Publishers Business Services, Inc.
and Ed Dantuma Enterprises, Inc.
David R. Koch (Nevada Bar No. 8830)
Koch & Scow, LLC
11500 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 210
Henderson, NV 89052
Telephone: (702) 318-5040; Facsimile: (702) 318-5039
Email: dkoch@kochscow.com
Attorney for Edward Dantuma and Persis Dantuma
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
17
18
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
19
APG-GWF
CASE NO. 2:08-cv-00620-PMP-PAL
Plaintiff,
20
21
vs.
22
PUBLISHERS BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., a
corporation; ED DANTUMA ENTERPRISES,
INC., a corporation, also dba PUBLISHERS
DIRECT SERVICES and PUBLISHERS
BUSINESS SERVICES; PERSIS DANTUMA;
EDWARD DANTUMA; and BRENDA
DANTUMA SCHANG, individually and as
officers or managers of Publishers Business
Services, Inc., or Ed Dantuma Enterprises, Inc.,
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE
SCHEDULE AND EXTEND CERTAIN
DEADLINES
27
28
Defendants.
1
Case 2:08-cv-00620-APG-GWF Document 287-1 Filed 10/30/15 Page 2 of 2
12th day of November, 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
J
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?