Henry et al v. Rizzolo et al

Filing 524

ORDER Denying 521 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and Reopen Discovery and Motion for Injunctive Relief Against Disposition or Transfer of Assets; and De nying 523 Defendant Fredrick Rizzolo's Joinder. The responses to Plaintiffs' motions shall be due on the originally scheduled date of 6/23/11. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 6/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 KIRK and AMY HENRY, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 12 vs. FREDRICK RIZZOLO aka RICK RIZZOLO, an individual, 14 LISA RIZZOLO, an individual, THE RICK AND LISA RIZZOLO 15 FAMILY TRUST, 13 16 Defendants. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:08-CV-00635-PMP-GWF ORDER Having read and considered the Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to 19 File an Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint 20 and Reopen Discovery and Motion for Injunctive Relief Against Disposition or 21 Transfer of Assets (Doc. #521), Defendant Fredrick Rizzolo’s Joinder (Doc. #523) 22 thereto, and Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant Lisa Rizzolo’s Ex Parte Motion for 23 Extension of Time (Doc. #522), 24 IT IS ORDERED that the Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to File 25 an Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and 26 Reopen Discovery and Motion for Injunctive Relief Against Disposition or Transfer 1 of Assets (Doc. #521) and Defendant Fredrick Rizzolo’s Joinder (Doc. #523) are 2 hereby DENIED. The responses to Plaintiffs’ motions shall be due on the originally 3 scheduled date of June 23, 2011. 4 5 DATED: June 14, 2011 6 7 8 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?