Klein v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. et al

Filing 140

ORDER AFFIRMING 135 Magistrate Judge Johnston's Minute Order, and OVERRULING 138 Plaintiff's Objection. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 8/6/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
Klein v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. et al Doc. 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 KARIN KLEIN, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, ) INC., et al. ) ) Defendant(s). ) ____________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** 2:08-cv-0681-RLH-RJJ ORDER Before the Court is a Minute Order (#135) entered by the Honorable Robert J. Johnston regarding his orders in response to a motion to compel, wherein he ordered Plaintiff to pay Defendant for costs incurred in reviewing, identifying and producing documents which Plaintiff had reviewed, but failed to identify or copy. Judge Johnston also ordered production of documents previously produced in camera. Plaintiff filed an Objection to Judge Johnston's Minute Order (#138) in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Abbot Laboratories filed a Response (#139) to the Objection, and this matter was referred for consideration. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Minute Order of Magistrate Judge Johnston is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Johnston's Minute Order (#135) is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Objection (#138) is overruled. Dated: August 6, 2010. _________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT Chief U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?