Howard v. Skolnik et al

Filing 84

ORDER Denying without Prejudice as premature 78 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/18/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)

Download PDF
Howard v. Skolnik et al Doc. 84 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GEORGE FOLEY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's "Second Request Ordering Compelling Discovery" (#78), filed September 27, 2010 and Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's "Second Request Ordering Compelling Discovery" (#83), filed October 14, 2010. On August 30, 2010, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's interrogatories and requests for production on or before September 21, 2010. Plaintiff states that he has still not received these discovery responses and asks this Court to again order Defendants to respond to his discovery requests. (#78). Plaintiff's motion is premature as, on September 22, 2010, the Court granted Defendants an extension of time to respond to the discovery requests. (#77). The responses are currently due on or before October 22, 2010. (Id.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Second Request Ordering Compelling Discovery" (#78) is denied without prejudice as premature. DATED this 18th day of October, 2010. REGINALD C. HOWARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HOWARD SKOLNIK, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No. 2:08-cv-00728-RCJ-GWF ORDER Motion to Compel (#78) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?