Young v. Zappos.com, Inc. et al

Filing 135

ORDER Denying 124 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/12/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
Young v. Zappos.com, Inc. et al Doc. 135 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________________ PEGGY A LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. #124) filed June 7, 2010. Defendant filed an opposition (Dkt. #132) June 24, 2010. On June 14, 2010, the District Judge entered an order (Dkt. #125) dismissing Defendants Jacqueline Marsh and Rachel Knight, and directing the clerk to close this case. The District Judge entered an order (Dkt. #127) June 15, 2010 granting Defendant's Motion for Judgment to Direct Entry of the Judgment in favor of Zappos.com against the Plaintiff. The clerk's judgment was entered in favor of Defendant Zappos.com and against the Plaintiff (Dkt. #126). Plaintiff attempted to appeal the District Judge's order granting Defendant Zappos.com's Motion for Summary Judgment. See Notice of Appeal, Dkt. #117. On June 23, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Plaintiff's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Order, Dkt. #130. As all of the claims against all of the Defendants have been dismissed and judgment has been entered in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. #124) is DENIED. Dated this 12th day of July, 2010. AKILAH YOUNG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ZAPPOS.COM, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No. 2:08-cv-00741-JCM-PAL ORDER (Plaintiff's Mot. for Sanctions - Dkt. #124) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?