Chudacoff v. University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada et al

Filing 411

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 333 Motion to Compel. (See Order for details). FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel is advised that a supplement to Fed.R.Civ.P.(a)(1) disclosures is not a substitute for appropriate responses to written discovery responses. FURTHER ORDERED that no sanctions are appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 3/22/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 RICHARD CHUDACOFF, M.D., 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, et al., 13 Defendant, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 208-863-ECR:-RJJ ORDER This matter is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel Discovery (#333). The Court having reviewed the Motion (#333), the Opposition (#341), and the Reply (#345), and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel Discovery (#333) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel Discovery (#333) 22 is granted to the extent that information requested is within the two categories authorized by the 23 District Court Judge when discovery was reopened. See, Order (#302). 24 25 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel Discovery (#333) is denied as to any other discovery sought that is outside the authorized categories. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel is advised that a supplement to Fed. R. 27 Civ. P. (a)(1) disclosures is not a substitute for appropriate responses to written discovery 28 responses. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no sanctions are appropriate. 2 DATED this 22d day of March, 2012. 3 4 5 6 7 ROBERT J. JOHNSTON United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?