Corbello v. DeVito
Filing
963
ORDER granting ECF No. 895 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss, dismissing with prejudice all of Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendant Thomas Gaetano DeVito; granting in part 905 Motion for Leave to Take Specified Dis covery (see order for details); granting ECF Nos. 897 , 900 , 901 , 902 , 906 , 907 , and 909 stipulations and motions to extend time; granting ECF No. 911 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
_____________________________________
DONNA CORBELLO,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
vs.
THOMAS GAETANO DEVITO et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:08-cv-00867-RCJ-PAL
ORDER
12
13
Plaintiff Donna Corbello is the widow and heir of Rex Woodard, who assisted Defendant
14
Thomas Gaetano “Tommy” DeVito in writing his unpublished autobiography (the “Work”).
15
Plaintiff alleges that DeVito and others wrongfully appropriated the Work to develop the
16
screenplay for Jersey Boys, a hit musical based on the band The Four Seasons that has played in
17
the United States, Canada, England, and Australia. The Court granted summary judgment to
18
certain Defendants and certified the order for immediate appeal. The Court of Appeals reversed
19
and remanded for further proceedings. The Court then determined on summary judgment that
20
the Work would be entitled to “thin” copyright protection at trial.
21
Plaintiff and DeVito have asked the Court to approve their stipulation for voluntary
22
dismissal of Plaintiff’s remaining claims against DeVito, submitting a Proposed Order (ECF No.
23
895-1) to that effect. DeVito’s co-Defendants have indicated their non-opposition to the
24
1 of 3
1
voluntary dismissal but have separately asked the Court to enter an order requiring Plaintiff and
2
DeVito: (1) to provide them with drafts of the Settlement Agreement and communications
3
exchanged between counsel (but not between any attorney and his or her client) from April 1,
4
2013 to present that in any way concern the settlement; and (2) to submit themselves and their
5
counsel to depositions within 30 days of disclosure upon co-Defendants’ request. Co-
6
Defendants argue this discovery is required for them to properly defend themselves at trial since
7
the Settlement Agreement appears to call for DeVito’s cooperation with Plaintiff, and their trial
8
strategy may now change. The Court grants the motion.
9
///
10
///
11
///
12
///
13
///
14
///
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
2 of 3
CONCLUSION
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (ECF No. 895) is
3
GRANTED, and all of Plaintiff Donna Corbello’s remaining claims against Defendant Thomas
4
Gaetano DeVito are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and
5
attorneys’ fees.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Take Specified Discovery
7
(ECF No. 905) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff shall provide DeVito’s co-Defendants with a
8
copy of any settlement agreement(s), as well copies of any communications exchanged between
9
Plaintiff’s and DeVito’s counsel (but not between counsel and client) from April 1, 2013 to
10
present that in any way concern such a settlement agreement. Thereafter, DeVito’s co-
11
Defendants shall have thirty (30) days to depose Plaintiff, DeVito, or their counsel as to matters
12
relevant to any settlement agreement (subject to attorney–client privilege).
13
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulations and Motions to Extend Time (ECF
Nos. 897, 900, 901, 902, 906, 907, 909) are GRANTED.
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Seal (ECF No. 911) is GRANTED.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
14th day of July, 2016.
Dated this 4th day of May, 2016.
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?