Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas Inc

Filing 308

FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 11/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Case 2:08-cv-00886-LDG-GWF Document 306-1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
800 IDEAS, INC. AND
)
SUSAN PARKER,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________ )

JERALD ALAN HAMMANN,

Case No.: 2:08-cv-00886
(PROPOSED)
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

10
11
12

This is an action for alleged violations of various FCC regulations, certain anti-trust claims
and common law claims brought by plaintiff Jerald Hammann (“Plaintiff’) against defendants

13

800 Ideas, Inc. and Susan Parker arising out of Plaintiff’s failed efforts to obtain two vanity toll

14

free telephone numbers (the “Disputed Numbers”). By way of Order entered on September 17,

15

2015 (Dkt. No. 301), this Court granted Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment

16

and allowed Plaintiff to submit authorities in support of his equitable claim for recovery of the

17

Disputed Numbers from a third party. On October 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Memorandum of
18
19

Law in support of his claim for equitable relief (Dkt. No. 305). On November 17, 2015,

20

Defendants filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law requesting that this Court grant

21

Plaintiff’s request for transfer of the Disputed Numbers and that this Court enter final judgment

22

in this matter dismissing with prejudice all claims against Defendants (Dkt. No. 306). For the

23

reasons set forth in the September 17, 2015 Order,

24

IT IS on this 20th day of ______ 2015
___
Nov.

25

ORDERED as follows:
26
27
28
29
30

1

Case 2:08-cv-00886-LDG-GWF Document 306-1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 2 of 2

1

1.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s claims of

2
3
4
5

alleged violations of FCC regulations in Counts One through Four and Counts Seven and Eight
of the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 217, pp. 8-11, 13-14);
2.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s claims of

6

alleged violations of the Sherman Act in Counts Five and Six of the Second Amended Complaint

7

(Dkt. No. 217, pp. 11-13);

8

3.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s Nevada State

9

common law claims in Counts Nine through Eleven of the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt.
10
11
12
13
14
15

No. 217, pp. 14-15);
4.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff dismissing with prejudice

the Second Amended Complaint in its entirety;
5.

Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff for his claim for equitable relief and Plaintiff is

hereby granted the right of subscribership to the Disputed Numbers.

16

Accordingly, this matter is CLOSED.
17
18

_______________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

2