Barfield et al v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB et al

Filing 36

ORDER REGARDING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiffs complaint against the only remaining defendant, Title Court Services, Inc., is DISMISSED for their failure to prosecute their claims; failure to respond to the Notice of Intent to Dismiss 25 ; failure to keep the court advised of their current address; and failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause 33 . Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/24/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ______________________________________ Robert C. Jones United States District Judge Before the Court for consideration is the (#35) Report of Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen, filed January 21, 2010. No opposition has been filed. The Court has conducted a review of the record in this case and determines that the R e p o rt of Findings and Recommendation (#35) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered J a n u a ry 21, 2010, should be affirmed. As such, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint against the only remaining d e fe n d a n t, Title Court Services, Inc., is DISMISSED for their failure to prosecute their c la im s ; failure to respond to the Notice of Intent to Dismiss (#25); failure to keep the court a d v is e d of their current address; and failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause (#33). DATED: February 24, 2010 vs. LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK FSB, et al., Defendants. JAMES D. BARFIELD, et al., Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:08-cv-001032-RCJ-PAL ORDER