Boar, Inc et al v. County of Nye et al

Filing 64

ORDER Denying 53 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice pending the filing of Defendants' Supplement to its Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/5/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** BOAR INC., a Nevada Corporation; KARL SNOWDON, individually and as a shareholder and President of Boar, Inc., MAVERICK SNOWDON, individually and as a shareholder and Director of Boar, Inc., SUZANNE SNOWDON, individually and as a shareholder and Secretary and Treasurer of Boar, Inc., Plaintiffs, vs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 :08-CV-01091-PMP-RJJ ORDER COUNTY OF NYE, a Political Subdivision of the Sate of Nevada and doing business as the Nye County ) Planning Department for the Pahrump ) Regional Planning District; JACK ) LOHMAN, individually and as Planning ) Director of Nye County Planning ) Department, RICHARD JOHNSON, ) individually and as Manager of Nye ) County Building Safety and Compliance,) ) Defendants. ) ) On April 15, 2010, this Court entered an Order (Doc. #60) staying briefing on dispositive motions pending discovery. The Order effectively stays until September 28, 2010, the obligation of the parties to fully and finally brief Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #53) filed March 3, 2010. To enable the Court to monitor this action through the court's electronic case filing system (ECF), IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (Doc. #53) shall be deemed DENIED without prejudice pending the filing of Defendants' Supplement to its Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed on August 12, 2010 in accord with this Court's Order (Doc. #60). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 5, 2010. PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?