FSP Stallion 1, LLC et al

Filing 499

ORDER Denying 447 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 449 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 452 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 453 Motion for Summary Judgment, Granting 478 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Eighth C laim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty as to Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, L.P. only, and Granting 453 Motion of Defendants Clay Womack, TIC Capital Markets, Inc. and Direct Capital Securities, Inc. for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' First and Second Claims for Federal Securities Fraud. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/16/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 FSP STALLION 1, LLC, et al., 9 v. 10 11 Plaintiffs, MICHAEL LUCE, et al., Defendants. 12 13 AND ALL RELATED CLAIMS 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:08-CV-01155-PMP-PAL ORDER ) ) ) The Court’s Order (Doc. #70) entered May 1, 2009, denying Defendants’ Motion 16 to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. #47) adequately sets for the background of this 17 action. On August 19, 2009, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. #320). 18 Thereafter, the Parties engaged in extensive discovery. On May 17, 2011, the Court 19 approved the stipulation of the Parties Dismissing Certain of the Parties’ Claims and 20 Counterclaims (Doc. #444). 21 Currently before the Court are Defendant William T. Walters’ and Golf Club of 22 Nevada, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. #449/455); Defendants Michael E. 23 Luce, Joe R. Munsch, Fairway Signature Properties, LLC, Evergreen Alliance Golf 24 Limited, L.P., and Stallion Mountain LeaseCo, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment 25 (Doc. #447); Defendants Clay Womack, TIC Capital Markets, Inc., and Direct Capital 26 Securities, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #453); and Defendant Alliance 27 Golf Limited, LP, and Stallion Mountain LeaseCo, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment 28 on Plaintiffs’ Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Doc. #452). Having considered the voluminous briefing of the Parties, and the arguments 1 2 presented at the hearing of August 11, 2011, the Court finds that there remain genuine 3 issues of material fact and witness credibility issues which warrant denial of the foregoing 4 Motions for Summary Judgment as to most of the claims remaining before the Court, and 5 now set for trial scheduled to commence December 5, 2011. 6 Specifically, the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Janus 7 Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 131 Supreme Court 2296 (2011) supports 8 summary judgment in favor Defendants Clay Womack, TIC Capital Markets, Inc. and 9 Direct Capital Securities, Inc. as to Plaintiffs’ First and Second Claims for Relief for 10 Federal Securities Fraud. Additionally, the Court finds Plaintiffs have failed to adduce 11 evidence giving rise to a genuine issue of material fact whether Defendant Evergreen 12 Alliance Golf Limited, L.P. owed a fiduciary duty to Plaintiffs sufficient to support 13 Plaintiffs’ Eighth Claim for Relief. As to all remaining Claims, however, the Court finds 14 genuine issues of material fact grounded in part on credibility determinations to be made 15 by the trier of fact require denial of the Summary Judgment Motions now before the 16 Court. 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Evergreen Alliance Golf 18 Limited, L.P.’s (“EAGL”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Eighth Claim for 19 Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Doc. #478) is GRANTED as to that Defendant only. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants Clay Womack, TIC 20 21 Capital Markets, Inc. and Direct Capital Securities, Inc. for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22 #453) is GRANTED only as to Plaintiffs’ First and Second Claims for Federal Securities 23 Fraud. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment 25 (Docs. #449/455, #447, #453, and #452) are DENIED in all other respects. 26 DATED: August 16, 2011. 27 28 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?