FSP Stallion 1, LLC et al

Filing 664

ORDER denying Defendants' 511 Motion in Limine to limit the scope of Plaintiffs' fraud claims to the allegations in the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/3/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8
9

FSP STALLION 1, LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

10

v.

11

MICHAEL LUCE, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14

AND ALL RELATED CLAIMS

15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:08-CV-01155-PMP-PAL
ORDER

A review of the Minutes (Doc. #653) of the hearing conducted December 28,

17

2011 regarding multiple motions in limine shows that the Court took under

18

submission Defendants’ Motion in Limine #4 (Doc. #511) to limit the scope of

19

Plaintiffs’ fraud claims to the allegations is the First Amended Complaint (Doc.

20

#511). Having had the opportunity to further review Defendants’ Motion and

21

Plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto (Doc. #580), in light of the arguments presented at

22

the hearing of December 28, 2011, and good cause appearing,

23

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine #4 (Doc. #511) is

24

DENIED.

25

DATED: January 3, 2012.

26
27
28

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge