Johnson v. Neven et al

Filing 103

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion to file his appendix under seal 96 and his motion to file his exhibits under seal 98 are both GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's second and third unopposed motions to extend time to file his reply to the answer 92 and 93 are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/26/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

LAUSTEVEION DELANO JOHNSON,

10

Case No. 2:08-cv-01363-JCM-RJJ

Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14

This habeas matter comes before the court on several motions to extend time as

15

well as motions to seal petitioner’s appendix and exhibits. Petitioner, through counsel,

16

has demonstrated compelling reasons under Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu,

17

447 F.3d 1172, 1178-1179 (9th Cir. 2006), that the appendix and exhibits to petitioner’s

18

reply to the answer should be filed under seal. Good cause appearing,

19
20

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to file his appendix under seal (ECF No.
96) and his motion to file his exhibits under seal (ECF No. 98) are both GRANTED.

21

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s second and third unopposed motions

22

to extend time to file his reply to the answer (ECF Nos. 92 and 93) are both GRANTED

23

nunc pro tunc.

24

DATED: 26 April 2016.

25
26

JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1