Michaud v. Bannister et al
Filing
33
ORDER that the Motions to Compel and Set a Trial Date 26 30 are DENIED. The parties shall submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order no later than August 21, 2011. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
JOHN MICHAUD,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
ROBERT BANNISTER et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:08-cv-01371-RCJ-PAL
ORDER
12
Plaintiff John Michaud is a prisoner at the Southern Desert Correctional Center
13
(“SDCC”) proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court
14
dismissed his claims as variously time-barred and moot. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part,
15
reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings as to Eighth Amendment damages claims
16
arising out of the alleged denial of cataract surgery in 2007 and 2008.
17
Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Compel (ECF No. 26) and a Motion to Set a Trial Date
18
(ECF No. 30). First, the motion to compel is moot, as the injury complained of has been
19
rectified, i.e., Defendants have agreed to place into Plaintiff’s inmate account the amount
20
previously deducted for the costs of the appeal. Second, setting a trial date would be premature.
21
As Defendants note, no discovery has yet taken place. Defendants suggest the Court should
22
solicit a discovery plan and scheduling order.
23
///
24
///
25
///
1
2
3
4
5
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Compel and Set a Trial Date (ECF Nos.
26, 30) are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed discovery plan and
scheduling order no later than August 21, 2011.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated this 22nd day of July, 2011.
8
9
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?