S. Parker Construction, Inc. v. Suntex Homes, LLC et al
Filing
92
ORDER Granting 90 Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendant Michael J. Lichtie. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
S. PARKER CONSTRUCTION, INC., a
Utah corporation, dba BARRY
PARKER CONSTRUCTION,
10
11
Plaintiff,
2:08-CV-1439 JCM (GWF)
Date:
Time:
N/A
N/A
v.
12
13
SUNTEX HOMES, LLC., et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
ORDER
17
Presently before the court is fourth-party plaintiff S. Parker Construction, Inc.’s (“Parker”)
18
motion to dismiss fourth-party complaint against fourth-party defendant Michael J. Lichtie without
19
prejudice. (Doc. # 90). No opposition has been filed.
20
Upon further reading of the present motion, it appears to be what is an incorrectly titled
21
voluntary dismissal. In its motion, plaintiff states that “the only claims remaining in this action are
22
S. Parker’s fourth-party claims as contained in its [f]ourth-[p]arty [c]omplaint against [f]ourth-[p]arty
23
[d]efendant, Michael Lichtie, who is appearing in proper person. However, S. Parker is desirous of
24
dismissing its [f]ourth-[p]arty [c]omplaint against Mr. Lichtie without prejudice and hereby
25
respectfully moves this [c]ourt to grant its instant [m]otion in this regard.” (Doc. # 90, p. 4). Thus,
26
the court will treat the present motion as a voluntarily dismissal of defendant Lichtie, and hereby
27
grants it.
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily
3
4
dismiss defendant Michael J. Lichtie (doc. # 90) be, and by the same hereby is, GRANTED.
DATED this 9th day of August, 2011.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?