S. Parker Construction, Inc. v. Suntex Homes, LLC et al

Filing 92

ORDER Granting 90 Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendant Michael J. Lichtie. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 S. PARKER CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah corporation, dba BARRY PARKER CONSTRUCTION, 10 11 Plaintiff, 2:08-CV-1439 JCM (GWF) Date: Time: N/A N/A v. 12 13 SUNTEX HOMES, LLC., et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 ORDER 17 Presently before the court is fourth-party plaintiff S. Parker Construction, Inc.’s (“Parker”) 18 motion to dismiss fourth-party complaint against fourth-party defendant Michael J. Lichtie without 19 prejudice. (Doc. # 90). No opposition has been filed. 20 Upon further reading of the present motion, it appears to be what is an incorrectly titled 21 voluntary dismissal. In its motion, plaintiff states that “the only claims remaining in this action are 22 S. Parker’s fourth-party claims as contained in its [f]ourth-[p]arty [c]omplaint against [f]ourth-[p]arty 23 [d]efendant, Michael Lichtie, who is appearing in proper person. However, S. Parker is desirous of 24 dismissing its [f]ourth-[p]arty [c]omplaint against Mr. Lichtie without prejudice and hereby 25 respectfully moves this [c]ourt to grant its instant [m]otion in this regard.” (Doc. # 90, p. 4). Thus, 26 the court will treat the present motion as a voluntarily dismissal of defendant Lichtie, and hereby 27 grants it. 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily 3 4 dismiss defendant Michael J. Lichtie (doc. # 90) be, and by the same hereby is, GRANTED. DATED this 9th day of August, 2011. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?