Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., v. LaSalle Bank National Association

Filing 169

ORDER Denying 113 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and 114 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., v. LaSalle Bank National Association Doc. 169 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PAT LUNDVALL (NSBN 3761) KRISTEN T. GALLAGHER (NSBN 9561) McDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP 2300 W. Sahara Avenue, #1000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Telephone: 702.873.4100 Facsimile: 702.873.9966 lundvall@mcdonaldcarano.com kgallagher@mcdonaldcarano.com PAUL D. SNYDER (Admitted pro hac vice) BRADLEY C. MIRAKIAN (Admitted pro hac vice) SNYDER LAW FIRM LLC 11551 Granada, Suite 100 Leawood, Kansas 66211 Telephone: 913.685.3900 Facsimile: 913.440.0724 psnyder@snyderlawfirmllc.com bmirakian@snyderlawfirmllc.com Attorneys for Plaintiff McDONALD · CARANO · WILSON LLP 2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 1000 · LAS VEGAS, NEVADA PHONE (702)873-4100 · FAX (702) 873-9966 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the Certificateholders of Commercial Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 2006-MF2, acting by and through CROWN NORTHCORP, INC. as Special Servicer, Case No.: 2:08-cv-1448-JCM-RJJ Plaintiff, vs. LaSALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 18 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Presently before the court is defendant LaSalle Bank National Association's ("Defendant") Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. #114). Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), as Trustee for the Certificateholders of Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-MF2, acting by and through Crown NorthCorp, Inc. ("Crown NorthCorp"), its Special Servicer (collectively "Plaintiff") filed a Response. (Dkt. #128). Defendant filed a Reply in support of its Motion. (Dkt. #146). Additionally, Plaintiff filed two supplements to its Response. (Dkt. ##148, 153). Thereafter, Defendant filed a Response to Plaintiff's Second Supplement and Errata. (Dkt. #158). Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Also before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Dkt. #113), as to which Defendant filed a Response and Plaintiff filed a Reply. (Dkt. #134 and #145). The court, having considered the papers and pleadings submitted and oral arguments of the parties present, finds that genuine issues of material fact preclude the entry of summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. #113) and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #114) be, and the same are, DENIED. DATED: March 3, 2011. McDONALD · CARANO · WILSON LLP 2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 1000 · LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89102 PHONE (702)873-4100 · FAX (702) 873-9966 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 219243.2 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: McDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP HOLLAND & HART LLP By: /s/ Kristen T. Gallagher By: /s/ Bryce K. Kunimoto (with consent) PAT LUNDVALL (NSBN 3761) BRYCE K. KUNIMOTO (NSBN 7781) KRISTEN T. GALLAGHER (NSBN 9561) 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, 10th Floor 2300 W. Sahara Avenue, #1000 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 bkunimoto@hollandhart.com plundvall@mcdonaldcarano.com kgallagher@mcdonaldcarano.com GREGORY A. MARKEL JASON M. HALPER PAUL D. SNYDER CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & BRADLEY C. MIRAKIAN TAFT LLP SNYDER LAW FIRM LLC One World Financial Center 11551 Granada, Suite 100 New York, NY 10281 Leawood, Kansas 66211 (Admitted pro hac vice) (Admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?