McIntosh et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
47
ORDER Denying 46 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/24/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
MICHAEL MCINTOSH et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
vs.
11
12
13
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:08-cv-01524-RCJ-RJJ
ORDER
14
15
This case arises out of a series of disputes between an apartment complex and two of its
16
residents, including a physical altercation leading to the arrest of one of the residents. The Court
17
recently granted a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for the Court to
18
reopen the case, i.e., a motion for reconsideration. The Court noted in the order that Plaintiffs
19
failed to appear at the hearing but granted the motion on the merits after considering all the
20
pleadings. Plaintiffs note that they filed a motion to continue the hearing the day before the
21
hearing, but the Court did not vacate the hearing, which had been scheduled for two months and
22
which required air travel of the undersigned and his staff. Plaintiffs argue that one of the
23
Plaintiffs was ill but do not allege that the other Plaintiff was unable to attend or that the first
24
Plaintiff was unable to attend telephonically. The remainder of the motion consists of recitations
25
and amplifications of allegations made in the Amended Complaint.
1
CONCLUSION
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 46) is DENIED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated this 23rd day of February, 2012.
Dated: This 24th day of February, 2012.
5
6
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?