McIntosh et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 47

ORDER Denying 46 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/24/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 MICHAEL MCINTOSH et al., 9 Plaintiffs, 10 vs. 11 12 13 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:08-cv-01524-RCJ-RJJ ORDER 14 15 This case arises out of a series of disputes between an apartment complex and two of its 16 residents, including a physical altercation leading to the arrest of one of the residents. The Court 17 recently granted a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for the Court to 18 reopen the case, i.e., a motion for reconsideration. The Court noted in the order that Plaintiffs 19 failed to appear at the hearing but granted the motion on the merits after considering all the 20 pleadings. Plaintiffs note that they filed a motion to continue the hearing the day before the 21 hearing, but the Court did not vacate the hearing, which had been scheduled for two months and 22 which required air travel of the undersigned and his staff. Plaintiffs argue that one of the 23 Plaintiffs was ill but do not allege that the other Plaintiff was unable to attend or that the first 24 Plaintiff was unable to attend telephonically. The remainder of the motion consists of recitations 25 and amplifications of allegations made in the Amended Complaint. 1 CONCLUSION 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 46) is DENIED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated this 23rd day of February, 2012. Dated: This 24th day of February, 2012. 5 6 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?