Ziplink, Inc. et al v. Ziplink, Inc. et al
Filing
80
ORDERED that, within 10 days of this order, Plaintiffs shall direct the court to the docket number corresponding to the Affidavit of Service for Susnar, file an Affidavit of Service for Susnar, or file a new proposed order not applicable to Susnar. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 5/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
ZIPLINK, INC., a Delaware Corporation;
ZACHS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NUMBER ONE, a Connecticut Partnership;
and HENRY M. ZACHS,
11
2:08-cv-1670-LDG-LRL
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
ZIPLINK, INC., a Nevada Corporation, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for default judgment against six of the eight named
17
defendants in this action. Although Plaintiffs moved for default against Susnar on the basis of an
18
Affidavit of Service demonstrating service by publication (#64), the court is unable to locate any
19
such Affidavit of Service for Susnar. Accordingly,
20
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that, within ten (10) days of this order, Plaintiffs shall
21
direct the court to the docket number corresponding to the Affidavit of Service for Susnar, file an
22
Affidavit of Service for Susnar, or file a new proposed order not applicable to Susnar.
23
24
DATED this _____ day of May, 2011.
25
26
______________________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?