Ziplink, Inc. et al v. Ziplink, Inc. et al

Filing 80

ORDERED that, within 10 days of this order, Plaintiffs shall direct the court to the docket number corresponding to the Affidavit of Service for Susnar, file an Affidavit of Service for Susnar, or file a new proposed order not applicable to Susnar. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 5/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 ZIPLINK, INC., a Delaware Corporation; ZACHS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NUMBER ONE, a Connecticut Partnership; and HENRY M. ZACHS, 11 2:08-cv-1670-LDG-LRL ORDER Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 ZIPLINK, INC., a Nevada Corporation, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiffs have filed a motion for default judgment against six of the eight named 17 defendants in this action. Although Plaintiffs moved for default against Susnar on the basis of an 18 Affidavit of Service demonstrating service by publication (#64), the court is unable to locate any 19 such Affidavit of Service for Susnar. Accordingly, 20 THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that, within ten (10) days of this order, Plaintiffs shall 21 direct the court to the docket number corresponding to the Affidavit of Service for Susnar, file an 22 Affidavit of Service for Susnar, or file a new proposed order not applicable to Susnar. 23 24 DATED this _____ day of May, 2011. 25 26 ______________________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?