Donovan et al. v. Flamingo Palms Villas, LLC, et al.
Filing
729
ORDER Denying #689 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on #689 Motion to Dismiss is VACATED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
FRAN DONOVAN et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
vs.
11
FLAMINGO PALMS VILLAS, LLC et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:08-cv-01675-RCJ-RJJ
ORDER
The present case arises out of an alleged conspiracy to defraud investors in a
15
condominium development in Las Vegas. The Court has already ruled on dozens of dispositive
16
motions. Most recently, the Court denied Defendant David Schwarz’s motion to dismiss the
17
Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) for failure to state a claim. Several Defendants have now
18
separately moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. As indicated at the most recent oral
19
argument, the Court is satisfied with the allegations in the TAC and will entertain no more
20
motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim in this three-year-old case. The Court therefore
21
denies the present motion to dismiss.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
CONCLUSION
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 689) is DENIED and
the hearing on that motion is VACATED. (The hearing on Motion No. 695 will proceed.)
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated this 6th day of October, 2011.
1.
6
7
_____________________________________
_________________________________
_
___
_____
_
ROBERT C. JONES
R ER
ROBERT C. JONES
N
United States District Judge
District
is
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?