Aytch v. Sablica et al

Filing 141

ORDER Denying 139 Plaintiff's Motion for Transcripts at State Expense. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 01/15/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 6 MARTINEZ AYTCH, 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 2:08-cv-01773-RLH-VCF CYNTHIA SABLICA, et al., ORDER Defendants. 10 11 12 Before the court is plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts at State Expense (#139). Defendants filed a Response (#140). 13 Plaintiff’s motion cites no authority to support his request. In response, defendants correctly cite 14 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) as the law governing the circumstances in which the court may authorize the 15 payments of fees, by the United States, for furnishing transcripts to party appealing in forma pauperis. 16 17 In pertinent part, 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) provides: 18 Fees for transcripts furnished in other proceedings to persons permitted to appeal 19 in forma pauperis shall also be paid by the United States if the trial judge or a 20 circuit judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous (but presents a substantial 21 question). 22 23 Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal (#133) provides no insight regarding the basis of his appeal. It 24 merely states that he appeals “from the Jury Verdict.” In his Motion for Transcripts (#139), Plaintiff 25 1 does not provide any information on which the court can rely in making a determination that his appeal 2 “is not frivolous (but presents a substantial question).” 3 4 The grounds on which he seeks to overturn the Jury Verdict do not appear in the record. Therefore, the court cannot certify that plaintiff’s appeal is not frivolous. 5 Accordingly, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts at State Expense (#139) is 7 8 DENIED. Dated this 15th day of January, 2014. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?