Hester v. Vision Airlines, Inc.

Filing 172

ORDER that Magistrate Judge Johnstons Order 152 is AFFIRMED, Visions Objections 158 are overruled, and Hesters Motion to Compel 93 is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 9/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** GERALD HESTER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) VISION AIRLINES, INC., ) ) ) Defendant. _______________________________________) Case No.: 2:09-cv-00117-RLH-RJJ ORDER (Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge­#158) Before this Court is an Order (#152) entered by the Honorable Magistrate Judge Johnston regarding Plaintiff Gerald Hester's Motion to Compel (#93), filed January 20, 2010. Defendant Vision Airlines, Inc. filed their Objection to Magistrate Judge Johnston's Order (#158) on September 15, 2010 in accordance with Local Rule LR IB 3-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Hester filed a Response (#160) on September 16, 2010, and this matter was referred to the undersigned for consideration. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A)­(C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Order of Magistrate Judge Johnston is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Johnston's Order (#152) is AFFIRMED, Vision's Objections (#158) are overruled, and Hester's Motion to Compel (#93) is GRANTED. Dated: September 21, 2010 ____________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?