Hester v. Vision Airlines, Inc.

Filing 183

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 132 Motion to Compel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Vision Airlines, Inc.s Motion to Compel 132 is GRANTED as to Interrogatory No. 1. Further, response to Interrogatory No. 1 is due on or bef ore October 14, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Vision Airlines, Inc.s Motion to Compel 132 is DENIED as to Interrogatory No. 2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 10/13/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 GERALD HESTER, etc., 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 VISION AIRLINES, INC., 12 Defendant, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT J. JOHNSTON United States Magistrate Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:09-cv-117-RLH-RJJ

ORDER

This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Defendant Vision Airlines, Inc.'s Motion to Compel (#132). The Court having reviewed the Motion (#132), the Response (#133), and the Reply (#134) and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Vision Airlines, Inc.'s Motion to Compel (#132) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Vision Airlines, Inc.'s Motion to Compel (#132) is GRANTED as to Interrogatory No. 1. Further, response to Interrogatory No. 1 is due on or before October 14, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Vision Airlines, Inc.'s Motion to Compel (#132) is DENIED as to Interrogatory No. 2. DATED this 13th day of October, 2010.