Clark v. Guerrero
ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 4:00 p.m., April 10, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/27/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MICHAEL E. CLARK,
ADRIAN GUERRERO, et al.,
Case No. 2:09-cv-00141-JCM-PAL
This matter is before the court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order as
required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#118) filed October 22, 2012,
required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) by February 26, 2013, or five
days after all dispositive motions are decided, whichever is later. The Order (Dkt. #136) Denying
Defendant’s motion to dismiss was entered August 8, 2013. There are no dispositive motions pending.
To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that
Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the
requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 4:00 p.m., April 10, 2014. Failure
to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a
recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions.
The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be
included in the pretrial order.
Dated this 27th day of March, 2014.
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?