Clark v. Guerrero

Filing 84

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 82 Motion for Transfer to NDOC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
Clark v. Guerrero Doc. 84 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the court is Plaintiff's Request for a Court Order to NDOC to Transfer Plaintiff Back to HDSP for trial (Dkt. #82). In an order entered September 27, 2010 (Dkt. #79), District Judge Mahan set this matter for trial October 18, 2010. However, the following day, Chief Judge Roger Hunt entered an order (Dkt. #80) consolidating this case with Case No. 2:10-cv-00736. His order directed that all pleadings be filed in Case No. 2:09-cv-00141 and that nothing else be filed in Case No. 2:10-cv-00736. The Order vacated the October 18, 2010 trial and directed Plaintiff to submit an Amended Complaint within thirty days stating all of the claims within both cases. The trial date has not been reset, and the thirty days for Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint has not yet run. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's Request (Dkt. #82) is DENIED. Dated this 7th day of October, 2010. MICHAEL E. CLARK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ADRIAN GUERRERO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:09-cv-00141-JCM-PAL ORDER (Request for Transfer to NDOC - Dkt. #82) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?