Incorp Services, Inc., v. Legalzoom.com, Inc.,

Filing 18

RESPONSE to 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Claim Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and Also To Strike Prayer For Relief Pursuant to FRCP 12(f); Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Claim Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and Also To Strike Prayer For Relief Pursuant to FRCP 12(f); Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof, filed by Plaintiff Incorp Services, Inc.,. (Opposition to Motion to Dismiss) Replies due by 4/20/2009. (Kronenberger, Karl)

Incorp Services, Inc., v. Legalzoom.com, Inc.,

Doc. 18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (admitted pro hac vice) 150 Post Street, Suite 520 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Law Offices of Rasmussen & Kang Dowon S. Kang (Bar No. 7042) (Local Counsel) 330 S. Third Street, Suite 1010 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff INCORP SERVICES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA INCORP SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, vs. LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. 2:09-cv-00273-RLH-LRL PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. 2:09-cv-00273-RLH-LRL

PLAINTIFF'S OPP. TO LEGALZOOM'S MOT. TO DISMISS
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s motion to dismiss has been mooted by Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). The issues raised in Defendant's motion are not at issue in the FAC. Accordingly, Plaintiff opposes Defendant's motion as moot.

DATED: April 6, 2009

KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP

By: /s/ Karl S. Kronenberger Karl S. Kronenberger Attorneys for Plaintiff Incorp Services, Inc.

Case No. 2:09-cv-00273-RLH-LRL

1

PLAINTIFF'S OPP. TO LEGALZOOM'S MOT. TO DISMISS