Incorp Services, Inc., v. Legalzoom.com, Inc.,

Filing 24

ORDER ON STIPULATION Granting 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File a Response to the Amended Complaint. Legalzoom.com, Inc., answer due 5/6/2009. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 04/10/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SRK)

Download PDF
Incorp Services, Inc., v. Legalzoom.com, Inc., Doc. 24 2 3 4 5 6 BOSTWICK & JASSY LLP Gary L. Bostwick (admitted pro hac vice) gbostwick@bostwickjassy.com Jean-Paul Jassy (admitted pro hac vice) jpjassy@bostwickjassy.com 12400 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400 Los Angeles, California 90025 Tel: 310-979-6059 Fax: 310-314-8401 7 Attorneys for Defendant LegaIZoom.com, Inc. 8 K R O N E N B E R G E R BURGOYNE, L L P 9 Karl S. Kronenberger (admitted p r o hac vice) 10 150 Post Street, Suite 520 San Francisco, CA 94108 I I Telephone: (415) 955-1155 Facsimile: (415) 955-1158 12 karl@KBinternetLaw.com 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 Incorp Services, Inc. 15 UNITED STATES D1STRlCT COURT 16 17 18 INCORP SERVICES, INC., a Nevada 19 corporation, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 P l a i n t i f f I n c o r p S e r v i c e s , Inc. ( " l n c o r p " ) f i l e d a F i r s t A m e n d e d C o m p l a i n t ( " F A C " ) -1S T I P U L A T I O N FOR E X T E N S I O N O F T I M E T O FILE R E S P O N S E T O FIRST A M E N D E D C O M P L A I N T D1STRlCT OF NEV ADA Case No. 2:09-CV-00273-RJH-(LRL) STIPULA n O N FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (First Request) Plaintiff, v. LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 28 o n April 6, 2 0 0 9 . I n c o r p a n d D e f e n d a n t L e g a I Z o o m . c o m , Inc. ( " L e g a I Z o o m " ) h e r e b y Dockets.Justia.com stipulate Ihat a responsive pleading or motion relating to the FAC may be filed up to and 2 including May 6, 2009. 3 4 This is the first extension sough I by LegalZoom relating to the FAC. The extension is sought due to the fact that the FAC alleges new claims for relief 5 under Nevada law which will require review and analysis beyond the 10 days normally 6 allowed within which t o respond 10 an amended complaint. Further. LegalZoom's 7 principal counsel is presently preparing for an argument before the 9th Circuit Court o f S Appeals and responding in wriling t o several other matters in the 9th Circuit and Califomia 9 slate courts. 10 DATED: April II L. 2009 BOSTWICK & JASSY LLP By 12 13 14 15 16 DATED: April 17 II' ~ ~Y ~ n ~ L. BOSTWICK Attomeys for Defendant LcgaIZoom.col11, Inc. L . 20lJ9 By KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP 19 20 21 22 j l "\ KARLS. KRONENBERGER Attomeys for Defendant Incorp Services, Inc. IT IS SO ORDERED: 23 24 25 26 27 ____ITED____T___D_STR_C__CO__RT__LER__ UN ____ STA_ES _ I ___ I _T __ U __ C ___ K CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: _ DATED: April 10, 2009 28 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION O P T I M E TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST A M E N D E D C O M P L A I N T

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?