Svete v. Wunderlich et al

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the letter 8 filed by a nonparty shall be STRICKEN.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and closethis case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/1/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)

Svete v. Wunderlich et al

Doc. 9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 DAVID W. SVETE, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On August 2, 2010, the court issued an order granting plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (docket #6). On August 13, 2010, the order served on plaintiff was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. Pursuant to Rule 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals, a pro se litigant is required to keep the court apprised of his or her current address at all times. Local Rule 2-2 states: "The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice." Accordingly, as plaintiff has failed to file written notification of change of address with the court, this action is dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) M.D. HOWARD F. WUNDERLICH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) / 2:09-cv-00345-JCM-RJJ ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 this case. STRICKEN.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the letter (docket #8) filed by a nonparty shall be

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close

1st day of September, 2010. DATED this _____ day of ______________________________, 2010.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2