Ramparts, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company et al.,

Filing 93

ORDER Denying without Prejudice 70 Motion for Expenses. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 *** 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 RAMPARTS, INC., a Nevada Corporation, d/b/a Luxor Hotel and Casino, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE ) COMPANY, a California Corporation; THE ) AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, an ) unknown entity; and DOES 1–50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) Case No.: 2:09-cv-00371-RLH-LRL ORDER (Motion for Expenses–#70) 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Ramparts, Inc.’s (“Luxor”) Motion for Expenses (#70, 19 20 filed ). Luxor brings this motion pursuant to Rule 37(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 21 Procedure, which provides that if a party fails to admit a fact requested by the other party in a 22 request for admission, the other party may be entitled to reasonable expenses, including attorney’s 23 fees, incurred in proving that fact. Luxor argues that Defendant American Insurance Company 24 wrongfully denied Luxor’s request for admission of certain facts during discovery, and that this 25 denial forced Luxor to expend time and money establishing those facts. 26 /// AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 1 1 However, as explained to the parties at Calendar Call on May 18, 2011, the Court 2 will not consider any motion for attorney’s fees until after trial. Therefore, the Court denies 3 Luxor’s motion as premature. 4 Accordingly, and for good cause appearing, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Luxor’s Motion for Expenses (#70) is DENIED 6 7 without prejudice. Dated: May 19, 2011 8 ____________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT Chief United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?