Williams v. University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada et al.,
Filing
215
ORDERED that subpart (G) of Defendants' Motion in Limine 150 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
CHARLES WILLIAMS, M.D., et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF )
SOUTHERN NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
2:09-CV-00554-PMP-PAL
ORDER
On May 3, 2011, the Court conducted a hearing regarding Defendants’
14
15
Motion in Limine No. 1 to exclude certain types of evidence (Doc. #150). The Court
16
took under advisement subpart (G) of Defendants’ Motion, which seeks to exclude
17
any testimony regarding economic damages offered by Plaintiff at trial because
18
Plaintiff has not disclosed an economic expert who can testify to economic loss,
19
future lost wages, present value and work expectancy.
Defendants’ motion goes too far. Clearly, Plaintiff can testify regarding his
20
21
earnings before and after the events giving rise to his lawsuit. Moreover, Plaintiff
22
can testify to his efforts to obtain employment since that time and can offer
23
documents previously produced and identified in the Joint Pretrial Order which
24
support his testimony.
25
///
26
///
1
Moreover, the fact that Plaintiff has not identified an economic expert does
2
not preclude Plaintiff from offering the testimony of hospital executives or others
3
who have suspended Plaintiff’s medical privileges because of the NPDB report filed
4
by Defendants.
5
Finally, the Court finds Plaintiff should be permitted to offer the testimony
6
of employment agency personnel regarding Plaintiff’s job search and inability to
7
obtain employment following his suspension.
8
9
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that subpart (G) of Defendants’ Motion
in Limine (Doc. #150) is DENIED.
10
11
DATED: May 9, 2011.
12
13
14
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?