Allied Property And Casualty Insurance Company v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp. et al

Filing 86

ORDER that plaintiff Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Companys motion to reconsider order granting defendants motion for partial summary judgment upon plaintiffs tort claims for economic damages 83 is GRANTED. A rehearing on defendant Beazer Homes Holdings Corporations motion for partial summary judgment upon plaintiffs tort claim for economic damages 61 will be held before this court on 11/19/10, at 10:00 am. Defendant Beazer Homes Holdings Corporation file any supplemental reply with the court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/22/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
Allied Property And Casualty Insurance Company v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp. et al Doc. 86 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, individually and as subrogee for its insured Joseph M. Holohan, Plaintiff, v. BEAZER HOMES HOLDINGS CORP., et al., Defendants. 2:09-CV-626 JCM (PAL) ORDER Presently before the court is plaintiff Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company's motion to reconsider order granting defendant's motion for partial summary judgment upon plaintiff's tort claims for economic damages (doc. # 83). Defendant Beazer Homes Holdings Corporation filed an opposition (doc. #84). Plaintiff filed a reply (doc. #85). On May 14, 2010, the court heard oral arguments from the parties regarding the defendant's motions for partial summary judgment (docs. #61 and #62). The court denied the motion for partial summary judgment upon plaintiff's negligence claim (doc. #62), and granted the motion for partial summary judgment upon plaintiff's tort claim for economic damages (doc. #61). In ruling, the court agreed with the defendant that the economic loss doctrine applied to the case, barring the plaintiff's recovery. In its present motion for reconsideration, the plaintiff asserts that the economic loss doctrine Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 precludes recovery of purely economic losses in tort absent bodily injury or damages to property other than the product itself. Calloway v. City of Reno, 116 Nev. 250, 993 P.2d 1259 (2000), overruled on other grounds, Olson v. Richard, 120 Nev. 240, 89 P.3d 31 (2004). Further, plaintiff asserts that it is undisputed that the product caused damages to property other than itself and the house in which it was installed, "including but not limited to two automobiles, furniture, carpeting, clothing, bedding, hand tools, power tools, electronic items, golf clubs, Christmas decorations and luggage." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company's motion to reconsider order granting defendant's motion for partial summary judgment upon plaintiff's tort claims for economic damages (doc. # 83) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a rehearing on defendant Beazer Homes Holdings Corporation's motion for partial summary judgment upon plaintiff's tort claim for economic damages (doc. #61) be held before this court on November 19, 2010, at 10:00 am. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Beazer Homes Holdings Corporation file any supplemental reply with the court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. DATED this 22nd day of October, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?