Peck v. City of Henderson et al

Filing 42

ORDER Denying as moot 37 Motion for a ruling, or to set hearing. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/5/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AXM)

Download PDF
Peck v. City of Henderson et al Doc. 42 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the court is defendant City of Henderson's (hereinafter "defendant") motion for a ruling or, in the alternative, to set a hearing (Doc. #37) regarding defendant's motion for a judgment on the pleadings, filed on August 13, 2009. Plaintiff Mary Kay Peck (hereinafter "plaintiff") filed a response (Doc. #39) on August 18, 2009 indicating she had no objection to defendant's motion. The motion defendant requests this court to set for hearing is defendant's motion for a judgment on the pleadings (Doc. #18), filed on June 25, 2009. Plaintiff filed her response (Doc. #26) to defendant's motion (Doc. #18) on July 23, 2009. Defendant replied (Doc. #34) on August 13, 2009. This court has set defendant's motion (Doc. #18) for a hearing on October 15, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant's motion for a ruling or, in the alternative, to set a hearing (Doc. #37) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. DATED this 5th day of October, 2009. MARY KAY PECK, an individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THE CITY OF HENDERSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:09­CV-00872 ORDER Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?