Brown v. Darcy et al
Filing
27
ORDER that Plaintiffs motion to extend time for filing a supplemental brief 26 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have an additional thirty (30) days, beginning immediately after the expiration of the previously granted five (5) days, to file a supplemen tal brief as described in this courts previous order 25 . Defendants motion for summary judgment 18 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in the interest of case management considerations. The court further directs the Clerks Office to reinstate and redocket Defendants motion 18 upon Plaintiffs filing of the aforementioned supplement. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
Brown v. Darcy et al
Doc. 27
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JEROME D. BROWN, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 DETECTIVE C. DARCY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Good cause appearing, 15 THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion to extend time for filing a 16 supplemental brief (#26) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have an additional thirty (30) days, 17 beginning immediately after the expiration of the previously granted five (5) days, to file a 18 supplemental brief as described in this court's previous order (#25). 19 THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#18) 20 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in the interest of case management considerations. The 21 court further directs the Clerk's Office to reinstate and redocket Defendants' motion (#18) upon 22 Plaintiff's filing of the aforementioned supplement. 23 DATED this _____ day of March, 2011. 24 25 26 ______________________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge ORDER 2:09-cv-0956-LDG-RJJ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?