Schemkes v. Presidential Limousine et al.

Filing 205

ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 11/9/2011. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 THOMAS THATCHER SCHEMKES, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) PRESIDENTIAL LIMOUSINE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:09-cv-01100-GMN-PAL ORDER 12 13 This matter is before the court on the parties’ failure to file a Joint Pretrial Order as required by 14 LR 26-1(e)(5). The most recent Order Extending Deadlines for Dispositive Motions (Dkt. #198) 15 entered July 19, 2011, extended the dispositive motions deadline to September 18, 2011. The joint 16 pretrial order, required by LR 26-1(e)(5), should have been received no later than thirty days after the 17 date set for filing dispositive motions. The date for filing dispositive motions has expired and there are 18 no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, 19 IT IS ORDERED that: 20 1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the 21 requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 4:00 p.m., November 9, 2011. 22 Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a 23 recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions. 24 2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be 25 included in the pretrial order. 26 Dated this 26th day of October, 2011. 27 28 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?