Schemkes v. Presidential Limousine et al.
Filing
205
ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 11/9/2011. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
THOMAS THATCHER SCHEMKES, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PRESIDENTIAL LIMOUSINE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:09-cv-01100-GMN-PAL
ORDER
12
13
This matter is before the court on the parties’ failure to file a Joint Pretrial Order as required by
14
LR 26-1(e)(5). The most recent Order Extending Deadlines for Dispositive Motions (Dkt. #198)
15
entered July 19, 2011, extended the dispositive motions deadline to September 18, 2011. The joint
16
pretrial order, required by LR 26-1(e)(5), should have been received no later than thirty days after the
17
date set for filing dispositive motions. The date for filing dispositive motions has expired and there are
18
no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
19
IT IS ORDERED that:
20
1.
Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the
21
requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 4:00 p.m., November 9, 2011.
22
Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a
23
recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions.
24
2.
The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be
25
included in the pretrial order.
26
Dated this 26th day of October, 2011.
27
28
______________________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?