Thompson et al v Autoliv Safety Technology Inc et al

Filing 144

ORDER Denying 126 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Denying 127 and 128 Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Claim for Punitive Damages and on Plaintiffs Back Injury Claim. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/3/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
-oOo-

6
7

NICOLE THOMPSON, et al.,
8

Plaintiffs,
9

vs.
10

AUTOLIV ASP, INC., et al.,
11

Defendants.
12
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:09-CV-01375-PMP-VCF
ORDER

Having read and considered Plaintiff’s fully briefed Motion for Partial

14

Summary Judgment (Doc. #126) and Defendants’ fully briefed Motions for Partial

15

Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claim for Punitive Damages and on Plaintiff’s

16

Back Injury Claim (Docs. #127 & 128), and finding that genuine issues of material

17

fact remain as to each of the claims at issue which warrant determination at trial, and

18

good cause appearing,

19

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

20

(Doc. #126) and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s

21

Claim for Punitive Damages and on Plaintiff’s Back Injury Claim (Docs. #127 &

22

128) are DENIED.

23

DATED: July 3, 2012.

24
25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge