Lowinger v. MGM Mirage et al

Filing 164

ORDER Denying 160 Ex Parte Motion for an Order Shortening Time. Defendants' Opposition to Lead Plaintiffs' Motion to Partially Lift Discovery Stay Due to Intentional Destruction of Relevant Evidence 158 shall be filed and served on or before 5/29/12, and Plaintiffs' Reply in support of their motion shall be filed on or before 6/11/12. A hearing in this matter is set for 6/20/12 at 9:30 am in Courtroom 3B. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 6 7 In Re MGM MIRAGE 2:09-cv -01558-GMN-VCF 8 SECURITIES LITIGATION ORDER 9 This Document Relates To: All Actions. 10 On May 11, 2012, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Partially Lift Discovery Stay due to 11 Intentional Destruction of Relevant Evidence (#158), and an Ex Parte Motion for an Order Shortening 12 Time (#160). 13 14 On May 14, 2012, Defendants filed an Objection to Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion for an Order Shortening Time (#162). 15 Having considered the Ex Parte Motion (#160), the Objection (#162), the Motion to Partially 16 Lift Stay (#158), and the supporting evidence and arguments submitted by both sides; and good cause 17 appearing: 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion for an Order Shortening Time is 19 DENIED. Pursuant to the applicable local rules, Defendants’ Opposition to Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion to 20 Partially Lift Discovery Stay Due to Intentional Destruction of Relevant Evidence (#158) shall be filed 21 and served on or before May 29, 2012, and Plaintiffs’ Reply in support of their motion shall be filed on 22 or before June, 11. 2012. A hearing in this matter is set for June 20, 2012, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 3B. 23 24 25 DATED this 15th day of May, 2012. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?